Upcoming Events
Most Popular
Tag Cloud
- Accounting
- Accounting Software
- Accounting Standards
- Auditing
- Banking
- FDR
- Finance
- Financial Planning
- GST
- Human Resources
- IFRS
- Insurance
- investment
- KiwiSaver
- MED
- Mortgages
- New Appointments
- NZICA
- Payroll
- PIE Tax
- Practice Development
- Rob Hosking
- Share Market
- Small Business
- Tax Law
- Tax Pooling
- Tax Tips
- Taxation
- Technology
Rules around associated persons relaxed
Rob Hosking, Wednesday, 01 July 2009 19:56
Far reaching changes to "associated persons" tax rules have had some of the sharp edges removed from them - but the thrust of the changes remain.
The Taxation (Life Insurance, International taxation and Remedial Matters) Bill included new rules for testing the association between natural persons who are each associated with a third person - the so-called "tripartite" test.
There are also changes for the test for association between trustees, settlors and beneficiaries.
One of the aims has been to close gaps in the rules as they apply to property developers and other investors.
However the original draft was criticised for its sweeping nature. Several submitters suggested taking it out of the bill and going back to square one but the select committee ruled that option out.
Instead, the rules have been narrowed.
The scope of the "tripartite test" has been confined to areas where the two persons are already associated to a third person under different associated persons tests (the Act has a number of such tests).
The rule associating relatives with each other will not apply if the person cannot be reasonably expected to know the other person actually exists.
In a partnership, a partner will not be automatically associated with the partners of their partner in another partnership).
The committee however rejected suggestions that property developers be allowed to hold land on capital as well as revenue account, depending on what the developer bought the land for.
Officials advised this would be too easy for investors to get around.
KPMG tax partner Paul Dunne said this omission was "disappointing" but that the other changes would remove "some of the harder edges" of the bill for developers.
First visit? Then sign up to our free Weekly Newsletter or subscribe to the NetProphet RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
